↓ Skip to main content

Risk of psychiatric illness from advanced paternal age is not predominantly from de novo mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
82 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of psychiatric illness from advanced paternal age is not predominantly from de novo mutations
Published in
Nature Genetics, May 2016
DOI 10.1038/ng.3577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Gratten, Naomi R Wray, Wouter J Peyrot, John J McGrath, Peter M Visscher, Michael E Goddard

Abstract

The offspring of older fathers have higher risk of psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and autism. Paternal-age-related de novo mutations are widely assumed to be the underlying causal mechanism, and, although such mutations must logically make some contribution, there are alternative explanations (for example, elevated liability to psychiatric illness may delay fatherhood). We used population genetic models based on empirical observations of key parameters (for example, mutation rate, prevalence, and heritability) to assess the genetic relationship between paternal age and risk of psychiatric illness. These models suggest that age-related mutations are unlikely to explain much of the increased risk of psychiatric disorders in children of older fathers. Conversely, a model incorporating a weak correlation between age at first child and liability to psychiatric illness matched epidemiological observations. Our results suggest that genetic risk factors shared by older fathers and their offspring are a credible alternative explanation to de novo mutations for risk to children of older fathers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 21%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 13%
Psychology 15 8%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#267,848
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#481
of 7,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,117
of 349,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#13
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.