↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Radiotherapy vs No Radiotherapy Based on Early Response to VAMP Chemotherapy and Survival Among Children With Favorable-Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association Between Radiotherapy vs No Radiotherapy Based on Early Response to VAMP Chemotherapy and Survival Among Children With Favorable-Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2012
DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.5847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monika L. Metzger, Howard J. Weinstein, Melissa M. Hudson, Amy L. Billett, Eric C. Larsen, Alison Friedmann, Scott C. Howard, Sarah S. Donaldson, Matthew J. Krasin, Larry E. Kun, Karen J. Marcus, Torunn I. Yock, Nancy Tarbell, Catherine A. Billups, Jianrong Wu, Michael P. Link

Abstract

More than 90% of children with favorable-risk Hodgkin lymphoma can achieve long-term survival, yet many will experience toxic effects from radiation therapy. Pediatric oncologists strive for maintaining excellent cure rates while minimizing toxic effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 39 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2012.
All research outputs
#2,485,318
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#13,778
of 36,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,305
of 177,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#63
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.