↓ Skip to main content

Left and right ventricular longitudinal strain-volume/area relationships in elite athletes

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Left and right ventricular longitudinal strain-volume/area relationships in elite athletes
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10554-016-0910-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Oxborough, Annemieke Heemels, John Somauroo, Gavin McClean, Punit Mistry, Rachel Lord, Victor Utomi, Nigel Jones, Dick Thijssen, Sanjay Sharma, Rebecca Osborne, Nicholas Sculthorpe, Keith George

Abstract

We propose a novel ultrasound approach with the primary aim of establishing the temporal relationship of structure and function in athletes of varying sporting demographics. 92 male athletes were studied [Group IA, (low static-low dynamic) (n = 20); Group IC, (low static-high dynamic) (n = 25); Group IIIA, (high static-low dynamic) (n = 21); Group IIIC, (high static-high dynamic) (n = 26)]. Conventional echocardiography of both the left ventricles (LV) and right ventricles (RV) was undertaken. An assessment of simultaneous longitudinal strain and LV volume/RV area was provided. Data was presented as derived strain for % end diastolic volume/area. Athletes in group IC and IIIC had larger LV end diastolic volumes compared to athletes in groups IA and IIIA (50 ± 6 and 54 ± 8 ml/(m(2))(1.5) versus 42 ± 7 and 43 ± 2 ml/(m(2))(1.5) respectively). Group IIIC also had significantly larger mean wall thickness (MWT) compared to all groups. Athletes from group IIIC required greater longitudinal strain for any given % volume which correlated to MWT (r = 0.4, p < 0.0001). Findings were similar in the RV with the exception that group IIIC athletes required lower strain for any given % area. There are physiological differences between athletes with the largest LV and RV in athletes from group IIIC. These athletes also have greater resting longitudinal contribution to volume change in the LV which, in part, is related to an increased wall thickness. A lower longitudinal contribution to area change in the RV is also apparent in these athletes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 32%
Sports and Recreations 9 17%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,335,248
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#54
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,420
of 348,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.