↓ Skip to main content

Scalar implicatures of embedded disjunction

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Language Semantics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 103)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Scalar implicatures of embedded disjunction
Published in
Natural Language Semantics, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11050-015-9116-x
Authors

Luka Crnič, Emmanuel Chemla, Danny Fox

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 16 52%
Philosophy 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,158,054
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Natural Language Semantics
#3
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,102
of 263,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Language Semantics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them