| Title |
Avoiding collateral mortality in a pandemic — time to change our mindset in surgical oncology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41571-020-0383-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ker-Kan Tan, Brendan J. Moran, Michael J. Solomon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 28% |
| Australia | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,241,181
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#542
of 2,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,799
of 414,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#23
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.