↓ Skip to main content

Clinical reasoning in neurology: Use of the repertory grid technique to investigate the reasoning of an experienced occupational therapist

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical reasoning in neurology: Use of the repertory grid technique to investigate the reasoning of an experienced occupational therapist
Published in
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, July 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2008.00737.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathy Kuipers, James W. Grice

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe the use of a structured interview methodology, the repertory grid technique, for investigating the clinical reasoning of an experienced occupational therapist in the domain of upper limb hypertonia as a result of brain injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Other 4 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 18 28%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 23%
Psychology 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2012.
All research outputs
#20,057,334
of 24,654,673 outputs
Outputs from Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
#661
of 716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,856
of 115,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,654,673 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.