↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Fluorouracil Plus Folinic Acid vs Gemcitabine Following Pancreatic Cancer Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
524 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Fluorouracil Plus Folinic Acid vs Gemcitabine Following Pancreatic Cancer Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2010
DOI 10.1001/jama.2010.1275
Pubmed ID
Authors

John P. Neoptolemos, Deborah D. Stocken, Claudio Bassi, Paula Ghaneh, David Cunningham, David Goldstein, Robert Padbury, Malcolm J. Moore, Steven Gallinger, Christophe Mariette, Moritz N. Wente, Jakob R. Izbicki, Helmut Friess, Markus M. Lerch, Christos Dervenis, Attila Oláh, Giovanni Butturini, Ryuichiro Doi, Pehr A. Lind, David Smith, Juan W. Valle, Daniel H. Palmer, John A. Buckels, Joyce Thompson, Colin J. McKay, Charlotte L. Rawcliffe, Markus W. Büchler, for the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 524 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 507 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 79 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 11%
Other 58 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 9%
Student > Master 45 9%
Other 122 23%
Unknown 113 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 265 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 33 6%
Unknown 129 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,976,436
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#12,387
of 36,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,009
of 108,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#43
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.