You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanical improvements to reinforced porous silk scaffolds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jbm.a.33158 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eun Seok Gil, Jonathan A. Kluge, Danielle N. Rockwood, Rangam Rajkhowa, Lijing Wang, Xungai Wang, David L. Kaplan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 19% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 16% |
| Engineering | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,452,627
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#349
of 2,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,305
of 130,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,629 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.