↓ Skip to main content

Treatment for Pulmonary Hypertension of Left Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for Pulmonary Hypertension of Left Heart Disease
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11936-012-0185-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Guazzi, Alessandra Vitelli, Valentina Labate, Ross Arena

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) secondary to left heart disease is a largely underestimated target of therapy. Except for a specific focus on PH consequences in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) receiving a left ventricular mechanical assist device or candidates for transplantation, prevention and treatment of initial subclinical forms of PH are not considered a priority in the management of this chronic disease population. Nonetheless, there is recent growing evidence supporting a clinical and prognostic role of PH in the elderly and in HF with preserved ejection fraction (pEF). Studies have defined PH-HFpEF as a new entity typically defining the evolving nature of disease. Although the prevalence of PH in these populations is not well-defined, the potential for effective pharmacological approaches that might impact the natural history of the disease starting from earlier stages is promising. However, it should be recognized that pharmacological studies performed to date with traditional pulmonary vasodilators in cohorts with HF and left-sided PH have not been positive, primarily because of concomitant systemic hypotension and hepatic side effects. This evidence along with the lack of studies specifically performed in the elderly and HFpEF often lead Guidelines to give neutral recommendations or even arbitrary assumptions. Recent availability of selective well-tolerated pulmonary vasodilators, such as phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, however, seem to offer a solid background for treating left-sided PH at both early and later stages of the disease process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,309,495
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
#318
of 409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,472
of 164,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.