↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the risk of invasive ants: a simple and flexible scorecard approach

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the risk of invasive ants: a simple and flexible scorecard approach
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00040-008-1013-6
Authors

D. F. Ward, M. C. Stanley, R. J. Toft, S. A. Forgie, R. J. Harris

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 38 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 49%
Environmental Science 11 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#324
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,710
of 82,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.