| Title |
Microscreening toxicity system based on living magnetic yeast and gradient chips
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-010-4241-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javier García-Alonso, Rawil F. Fakhrullin, Vesselin N. Paunov, Zheng Shen, Joerg D. Hardege, Nicole Pamme, Stephen J. Haswell, Gillian M. Greenway |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#727
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,506
of 108,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#18
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.