| Title |
Cumulative effects of consecutive running sessions on hemolysis, inflammation and hepcidin activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-009-0988-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Peeling, Brian Dawson, Carmel Goodman, Grant Landers, Erwin T. Wiegerinck, Dorine W. Swinkels, Debbie Trinder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 23 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3,319
of 4,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,385
of 185,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.