| Title |
Emergence of network structure due to spike-timing-dependent plasticity in recurrent neuronal networks. I. Input selectivity–strengthening correlated input pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00422-009-0319-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthieu Gilson, Anthony N. Burkitt, David B. Grayden, Doreen A. Thomas, J. Leo van Hemmen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 32% |
| Researcher | 26 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 13% |
| Engineering | 13 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#185
of 676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,436
of 110,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 676 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them