| Title |
On the causes of variability in amounts of airborne grass pollen in Melbourne, Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Biometeorology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00484-010-0361-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julian de Morton, John Bye, Alexandre Pezza, Edward Newbigin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,007,909
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#165
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,517
of 95,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them