| Title |
A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-010-0827-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. B. Jensen, A. M. L. Pedersen, A. Vissink, E. Andersen, C. G. Brown, A. N. Davies, J. Dutilh, J. S. Fulton, L. Jankovic, N. N. F. Lopes, A. L. S. Mello, L. V. Muniz, C. A. Murdoch-Kinch, R. G. Nair, J. J. Napeñas, A. Nogueira-Rodrigues, D. Saunders, B. Stirling, I. von Bültzingslöwen, D. S. Weikel, L. S. Elting, F. K. L. Spijkervet, M. T. Brennan, Salivary Gland Hypofunction/Xerostomia Section, Oral Care Study Group, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/International Society of Oral Oncology (ISOO) |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 295 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 66 | 22% |
| Unknown | 72 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 95 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2,205
of 5,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,744
of 115,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.