↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00520-011-1119-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Luckett, B. Britton, K. Clover, N. M. Rankin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2,205
of 5,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,082
of 124,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.