↓ Skip to main content

Direct Measurement Versus Surrogate Indicator Species for Evaluating Environmental Change and Biodiversity Loss

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
Title
Direct Measurement Versus Surrogate Indicator Species for Evaluating Environmental Change and Biodiversity Loss
Published in
Ecosystems, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10021-010-9394-6
Authors

David B. Lindenmayer, Gene E. Likens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
United States 6 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Chile 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 339 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 19%
Researcher 60 16%
Student > Master 58 16%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Other 21 6%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 59 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 155 42%
Environmental Science 105 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 4%
Social Sciences 5 1%
Engineering 5 1%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 68 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,393,063
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#452
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,368
of 113,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.