↓ Skip to main content

Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism in very‐low‐birth‐weight babies: the need for a second test

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism in very‐low‐birth‐weight babies: the need for a second test
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10545-011-9286-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunita Bijarnia, Bridget Wilcken, Veronica C. Wiley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 14%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 14 29%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#686
of 1,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,727
of 106,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.