| Title |
Harnessing multiple models for outbreak management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abb9934 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katriona Shea, Michael C Runge, David Pannell, William J M Probert, Shou-Li Li, Michael Tildesley, Matthew Ferrari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 11% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Philippines | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 27 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 67% |
| Scientists | 20 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 27% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#268,494
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from Science
#7,189
of 80,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,291
of 387,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#232
of 950 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 950 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.