| Title |
Interdisciplinary approaches: towards new statistical methods for phenological studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-010-9859-9 |
| Authors |
Irene Lena Hudson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 24% |
| Researcher | 31 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,903,330
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,333
of 5,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,839
of 94,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#35
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.