↓ Skip to main content

Genetically effective population sizes of Antarctic seals estimated from nuclear genes

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genetically effective population sizes of Antarctic seals estimated from nuclear genes
Published in
Conservation Genetics, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10592-011-0241-x
Authors

Caitlin Curtis, Brent S. Stewart, Stephen A. Karl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 3%
Norway 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Guatemala 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 66%
Environmental Science 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,976,330
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#432
of 1,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,390
of 116,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.