| Title |
Distinguishing Defensive Characteristics in the Phloem of Ash Species Resistant and Susceptible to Emerald Ash Borer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Ecology, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10886-011-9954-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Don Cipollini, Qin Wang, Justin G. A. Whitehill, Jeff R. Powell, Pierluigi Bonello, Daniel A. Herms |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#5,898,100
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#478
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,938
of 110,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.