↓ Skip to main content

Problem Gambling and the Circumstances Facing Older People

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Problem Gambling and the Circumstances Facing Older People
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10899-007-9079-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenni Southwell, Paul Boreham, Warren Laffan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 26%
Social Sciences 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#327
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,518
of 155,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.