| Title |
Mahjong Gambling in the Chinese-Australian Community in Sydney: A Prevalence Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10899-009-9159-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wu Yi Zheng, Michael Walker, Alex Blaszczynski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,913,981
of 23,983,367 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#338
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,201
of 171,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.