↓ Skip to main content

Beliefs About Gambling Problems and Recovery: Results from a General Population Telephone Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Beliefs About Gambling Problems and Recovery: Results from a General Population Telephone Survey
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10899-010-9231-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

John A. Cunningham, Joanne Cordingley, David C. Hodgins, Tony Toneatto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 33%
Social Sciences 8 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#397
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,065
of 190,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.