↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular risk screening program in Australian community pharmacies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Cardiovascular risk screening program in Australian community pharmacies
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11096-010-9379-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory M. Peterson, Kimbra D. Fitzmaurice, Helen Kruup, Shane L. Jackson, Rohan L. Rasiah

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#632
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,328
of 102,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them