↓ Skip to main content

Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life
Published in
Quality of Life Research, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11136-007-9293-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Brennan, A. John Spencer, Kaye F. Roberts-Thomson

Abstract

Middle-aged and older adults are retaining teeth and avoiding dentures, which should impact quality of life. The aims of our study were to investigate tooth loss and chewing ability and their association with oral- and general-health-related quality of life and life satisfaction. A random sample of 45- to 54-year-olds from Adelaide, South Australia, was surveyed by self-complete questionnaire in 2004-2005 (n = 879, response rate = 43.8%). Health-related quality of life was measured with the Oral Health Impact Profile 14-item version and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale instruments and life satisfaction by the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Functional tooth units were recorded at oral examinations performed by calibrated dentists on 709 persons (completion rate = 80.7%). Number of functional teeth was positively associated with chewing ability (beta = 0.31, P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, controlling for number of functional teeth and other explanatory variables spanning dental visit pattern, dental behaviour, socio-demographics and socio-economic status, chewing ability was negatively associated with oral-health-related impacts (beta = -0.37, P < 0.01) and positively associated with general health (beta = 0.10, P < 0.05) and well-being (beta = 0.16, P < 0.01). Chewing ability was related to oral-health-related quality of life and general health, possibly reflecting the impact of chewing on food choice and enjoyment of meals and diet, and also indicated the importance of oral health to general well-being.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 185 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 58 30%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 44 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,916,068
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#459
of 2,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,375
of 159,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,952 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them