| Title |
Expertise reversal effect in using explanatory notes for readers of Shakespearean text
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Instructional Science, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11251-009-9109-6 |
| Authors |
Annishka Oksa, Slava Kalyuga, Paul Chandler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 28% |
| Psychology | 12 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,289,939
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#44
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,092
of 99,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.