↓ Skip to main content

A hybrid life cycle assessment model for comparison with conventional methodologies in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
A hybrid life cycle assessment model for comparison with conventional methodologies in Australia
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11367-009-0093-5
Authors

Hazel V. Rowley, Sven Lundie, Gregory M. Peters

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 119 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 24%
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 40 31%
Engineering 29 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#445
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,109
of 117,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.