↓ Skip to main content

Open versus Two Forms of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Open versus Two Forms of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11999-009-0706-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neal L. Millar, Xiao Wu, Robyn Tantau, Elizabeth Silverstone, George A. C. Murrell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Andorra 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Other 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Engineering 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#821
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,526
of 186,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.