Title |
Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA®-SF): A practical tool for identification of nutritional status
|
---|---|
Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, November 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12603-009-0214-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M.J. Kaiser, J.M. Bauer, C. Ramsch, W. Uter, Y. Guigoz, T. Cederholm, D.R. Thomas, P. Anthony, K.E. Charlton, M. Maggio, A.C. Tsai, D. Grathwohl, B. Vellas, C.C. Sieber |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 831 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 825 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 117 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 110 | 13% |
Researcher | 79 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 56 | 7% |
Other | 161 | 19% |
Unknown | 240 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 270 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 132 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 4% |
Psychology | 16 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 13 | 2% |
Other | 76 | 9% |
Unknown | 288 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,639,635
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#186
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,898
of 109,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.