| Title |
Impact of climate and public health interventions on the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.200920 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Jüni, Martina Rothenbühler, Pavlos Bobos, Kevin E. Thorpe, Bruno R. da Costa, David N. Fisman, Arthur S. Slutsky, Dionne Gesink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 872 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 203 | 23% |
| Canada | 73 | 8% |
| United States | 37 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 2% |
| France | 15 | 2% |
| Norway | 10 | 1% |
| Japan | 10 | 1% |
| Australia | 9 | 1% |
| Dominican Republic | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 72 | 8% |
| Unknown | 420 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 708 | 81% |
| Scientists | 91 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 52 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 392 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 78 | 20% |
| Unknown | 116 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 92 | 23% |
| Unknown | 134 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1866. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,321
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#7
of 9,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355
of 416,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.