↓ Skip to main content

Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of centromeres

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosome Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of centromeres
Published in
Chromosome Research, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10577-012-9296-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura S. Burrack, Judith Berman

Abstract

Neocentromeres are ectopic sites where new functional kinetochores assemble and permit chromosome segregation. Neocentromeres usually form following genomic alterations that remove or disrupt centromere function. The ability to form neocentromeres is conserved in eukaryotes ranging from fungi to mammals. Neocentromeres that rescue chromosome fragments in cells with gross chromosomal rearrangements are found in several types of human cancers, and in patients with developmental disabilities. In this review, we discuss the importance of neocentromeres to human health and evaluate recently developed model systems to study neocentromere formation, maintenance, and function in chromosome segregation. Additionally, studies of neocentromeres provide insight into native centromeres; analysis of neocentromeres found in human clinical samples and induced in model organisms distinguishes features of centromeres that are dependent on centromere DNA from features that are epigenetically inherited together with the formation of a functional kinetochore.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 22%
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,109,584
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Chromosome Research
#102
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,741
of 164,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosome Research
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.