↓ Skip to main content

Faunal impact on vegetation structure and ecosystem function in mangrove forests: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Botany, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
345 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
720 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Faunal impact on vegetation structure and ecosystem function in mangrove forests: A review
Published in
Aquatic Botany, August 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.01.009
Authors

Stefano Cannicci, Damien Burrows, Sara Fratini, Thomas J. Smith, Joachim Offenberg, Farid Dahdouh-Guebas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 720 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 10 1%
Mexico 6 <1%
India 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Philippines 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Other 18 3%
Unknown 670 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 136 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 126 18%
Student > Bachelor 102 14%
Researcher 94 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 5%
Other 132 18%
Unknown 95 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 285 40%
Environmental Science 228 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 35 5%
Engineering 12 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 1%
Other 36 5%
Unknown 115 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Botany
#82
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,297
of 97,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Botany
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.