You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservation planning under climate change: Toward accounting for uncertainty in predicted species distributions to increase confidence in conservation investments in space and time
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.024 |
| Authors |
Sílvia B. Carvalho, José C. Brito, Eduardo G. Crespo, Matthew E. Watts, Hugh P. Possingham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 467 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 4% |
| Unknown | 414 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 124 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 218 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 142 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 1% |
| Engineering | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 3% |
| Unknown | 68 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,346
of 6,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,171
of 128,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.