↓ Skip to main content

Suppression of allergic airway inflammation and IgE responses by a class I restricted allergen peptide vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Mucosal Immunology (1933-0219), October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suppression of allergic airway inflammation and IgE responses by a class I restricted allergen peptide vaccine
Published in
Mucosal Immunology (1933-0219), October 2008
DOI 10.1038/mi.2008.69
Pubmed ID
Authors

J W Wells, K Choy, C M Lloyd, A Noble

Abstract

CD8 T cells are known to deviate CD4 T-cell responses from Th2 toward Th1. Reduction of Th2 cytokines and increased interferon-gamma ameliorates allergic airway disease. We have developed a novel approach to the suppression of allergic airway inflammation, by designing a MHC class I-restricted allergen peptide vaccine, which induces potent and long-lived CD8 T-cell responses. Vaccination of C57BL/6 mice before allergen sensitization completely prevented allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody responses. Vaccination after sensitization failed to suppress IgE, but inhibited accumulation of eosinophils and neutrophils in airways after subsequent allergen challenge. Vaccination suppressed Th2 airway infiltration and enhanced the lung Th1 response without inducing excessive CD8 cellular infiltration or interleukin-17, and the combination of class I peptide with adjuvant was more effective than adjuvant alone. Airway hyperreactivity was prevented by vaccination in an allergen-specific fashion. Class I peptide vaccines might therefore represent a robust and long-lasting immunotherapeutic strategy in allergic disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,406,430
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Mucosal Immunology (1933-0219)
#879
of 1,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,794
of 105,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mucosal Immunology (1933-0219)
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.