↓ Skip to main content

食品パッケージに表象する昆虫のイメージに関する文化昆虫学的研究

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Itami City Museum of Insects, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
食品パッケージに表象する昆虫のイメージに関する文化昆虫学的研究
Published in
Bulletin of the Itami City Museum of Insects, March 2020
DOI 10.34335/itakon.8.0_1
Authors

高田 兼太

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,179,141
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Itami City Museum of Insects
#10
of 18 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,931
of 383,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Itami City Museum of Insects
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.