You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of arsenic and kidney dysfunction in people with diabetes and validation of its effects in rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environment International, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envint.2008.07.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian Ping Wang, Sheng Ling Wang, Qin Lin, Ling Zhang, Daphne Huang, Jack C. Ng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 27% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 25% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environment International
#2,868
of 5,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,879
of 98,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment International
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.