↓ Skip to main content

産褥早期の足湯が乳頭形態と乳頭・乳輪の状態に及ぼす影響

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Academy of Midwifery, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
産褥早期の足湯が乳頭形態と乳頭・乳輪の状態に及ぼす影響
Published in
Journal of Japan Academy of Midwifery, January 2019
DOI 10.3418/jjam.jjam-2018-0023
Authors

小島 德子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,549,209
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Academy of Midwifery
#4
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,617
of 438,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Academy of Midwifery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them