You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Costing the conservation of animal genetic resources: The case of Borana cattle in Ethiopia and Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Arid Environments, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.11.003 |
| Authors |
K.K. Zander, A.G. Drucker, K. Holm-Müller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 17% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,138,262
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Arid Environments
#114
of 1,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,750
of 107,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Arid Environments
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.