↓ Skip to main content

Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
815 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1395 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta‐analysis
Published in
Ecology Letters, May 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramiro Aguilar, Lorena Ashworth, Leonardo Galetto, Marcelo Adrián Aizen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 32 2%
United States 19 1%
Spain 7 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
France 5 <1%
Argentina 5 <1%
Colombia 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Other 24 2%
Unknown 1284 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 269 19%
Student > Master 242 17%
Researcher 231 17%
Student > Bachelor 165 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 76 5%
Other 234 17%
Unknown 178 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 792 57%
Environmental Science 296 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 2%
Computer Science 7 <1%
Other 33 2%
Unknown 213 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,950,401
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#1,598
of 3,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,330
of 90,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.