↓ Skip to main content

Protein-altering germline mutations implicate novel genes related to lung cancer development

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Protein-altering germline mutations implicate novel genes related to lung cancer development
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15905-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuemei Ji, Semanti Mukherjee, Maria Teresa Landi, Yohan Bosse, Philippe Joubert, Dakai Zhu, Ivan Gorlov, Xiangjun Xiao, Younghun Han, Olga Gorlova, Rayjean J. Hung, Yonathan Brhane, Robert Carreras-Torres, David C. Christiani, Neil Caporaso, Mattias Johansson, Geoffrey Liu, Stig E. Bojesen, Loic Le Marchand, Demetrios Albanes, Heike Bickeböller, Melinda C. Aldrich, William S. Bush, Adonina Tardon, Gad Rennert, Chu Chen, Jinyoung Byun, Konstantin H. Dragnev, John K. Field, Lambertus FA. Kiemeney, Philip Lazarus, Shan Zienolddiny, Stephen Lam, Matthew B. Schabath, Angeline S. Andrew, Pier A. Bertazzi, Angela C. Pesatori, Nancy Diao, Li Su, Lei Song, Ruyang Zhang, Natasha Leighl, Jakob S. Johansen, Anders Mellemgaard, Walid Saliba, Christopher Haiman, Lynne Wilkens, Ana Fernandez-Somoano, Guillermo Fernandez-Tardon, Erik H. F. M. van der Heijden, Jin Hee Kim, Michael P. A. Davies, Michael W. Marcus, Hans Brunnström, Jonas Manjer, Olle Melander, David C. Muller, Kim Overvad, Antonia Trichopoulou, Rosario Tumino, Gary E. Goodman, Angela Cox, Fiona Taylor, Penella Woll, Erich Wichmann, Thomas Muley, Angela Risch, Albert Rosenberger, Kjell Grankvist, Mikael Johansson, Frances Shepherd, Ming-Sound Tsao, Susanne M. Arnold, Eric B. Haura, Ciprian Bolca, Ivana Holcatova, Vladimir Janout, Milica Kontic, Jolanta Lissowska, Anush Mukeria, Simona Ognjanovic, Tadeusz M. Orlowski, Ghislaine Scelo, Beata Swiatkowska, David Zaridze, Per Bakke, Vidar Skaug, Lesley M. Butler, Kenneth Offit, Preethi Srinivasan, Chaitanya Bandlamudi, Matthew D. Hellmann, David B. Solit, Mark E. Robson, Charles M. Rudin, Zsofia K. Stadler, Barry S. Taylor, Michael F. Berger, Richard Houlston, John McLaughlin, Victoria Stevens, David C. Nickle, Ma’en Obeidat, Wim Timens, María Soler Artigas, Sanjay Shete, Hermann Brenner, Stephen Chanock, Paul Brennan, James D. McKay, Christopher I. Amos

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 4 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 40 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 42 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#957,837
of 34,619,351 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#16,174
of 83,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,956
of 446,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#377
of 1,555 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,619,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,555 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.