You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Child health and the income gradient: Evidence from Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Health Economics, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.05.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rasheda Khanam, Hong Son Nghiem, Luke B. Connelly |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 37 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,132,931
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Economics
#241
of 2,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,096
of 122,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Economics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.