You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
3D Gradient coil design – Toroidal surfaces
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Magnetic Resonance, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.01.006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter T. While, Larry K. Forbes, Stuart Crozier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 28% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 9 | 36% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 12% |
Chemistry | 3 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Magnetic Resonance
#283
of 2,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,373
of 184,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Magnetic Resonance
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.