You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Novel Nafion composite membranes with mesoporous silica nanospheres as inorganic fillers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Power Sources, December 2008
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.094 |
Authors |
Yonggang Jin, Shizhang Qiao, Lei Zhang, Zhi Ping Xu, Simon Smart, João C. Diniz da Costa, Gao Qing Lu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 22 | 29% |
Engineering | 13 | 17% |
Chemical Engineering | 6 | 8% |
Materials Science | 5 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Power Sources
#2,592
of 9,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,506
of 179,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Power Sources
#14
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,670 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.