↓ Skip to main content

Translocator Protein PET Imaging for Glial Activation in Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Translocator Protein PET Imaging for Glial Activation in Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11481-010-9243-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Unsong Oh, Masahiro Fujita, Vasiliki N. Ikonomidou, Iordanis E. Evangelou, Eiji Matsuura, Erin Harberts, Joan Ohayon, Victor W. Pike, Yi Zhang, Sami S. Zoghbi, Robert B. Innis, Steven Jacobson

Abstract

Glial activation in the setting of central nervous system inflammation is a key feature of the multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology. Monitoring glial activation in subjects with MS, therefore, has the potential to be informative with respect to disease activity. The translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO) is a promising biomarker of glial activation that can be imaged by positron emission tomography (PET). To characterize the in vivo TSPO expression in MS, we analyzed brain PET scans in subjects with MS and healthy volunteers in an observational study using [(11)C]PBR28, a newly developed translocator protein-specific radioligand. The [(11)C]PBR28 PET showed altered compartmental distribution of TSPO in the MS brain compared to healthy volunteers (p = 0.019). Focal increases in [(11)C]PBR28 binding corresponded to areas of active inflammation as evidenced by significantly greater binding in regions of gadolinium contrast enhancement compared to contralateral normal-appearing white matter (p = 0.0039). Furthermore, increase in [(11)C]PBR28 binding preceded the appearance of contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging in some lesions, suggesting a role for early glial activation in MS lesion formation. Global [(11)C]PBR28 binding showed correlation with disease duration (p = 0.041), but not with measures of clinical disability. These results further define TSPO as an informative marker of glial activation in MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 37%
Neuroscience 15 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2012.
All research outputs
#15,270,937
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#351
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,869
of 100,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.