↓ Skip to main content

クガビル科(ヒル下綱:吻無蛭目:イシビル形亜目)の分類と種同定のための簡易検索

Overview of attention for article published in Edaphologia, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
クガビル科(ヒル下綱:吻無蛭目:イシビル形亜目)の分類と種同定のための簡易検索
Published in
Edaphologia, April 2018
DOI 10.20695/edaphologia.100.0_19
Authors

中野 隆文

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#16,158,698
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Edaphologia
#15
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,047
of 344,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Edaphologia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.