You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pain (03043959), March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert H. Dworkin, Dennis C. Turk, Sarah Peirce-Sandner, Ralf Baron, Nicholas Bellamy, Laurie B. Burke, Amy Chappell, Kevin Chartier, Charles S. Cleeland, Ann Costello, Penney Cowan, Rozalina Dimitrova, Susan Ellenberg, John T. Farrar, Jacqueline A. French, Ian Gilron, Sharon Hertz, Alejandro R. Jadad, Gary W. Jay, Jarkko Kalliomäki, Nathaniel P. Katz, Robert D. Kerns, Donald C. Manning, Michael P. McDermott, Patrick J. McGrath, Arvind Narayana, Linda Porter, Steve Quessy, Bob A. Rappaport, Christine Rauschkolb, Bryce B. Reeve, Thomas Rhodes, Cristina Sampaio, David M. Simpson, Joseph W. Stauffer, Gerold Stucki, Jeffrey Tobias, Richard E. White, James Witter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 285 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 12% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Professor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 67 | 22% |
| Unknown | 46 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 39% |
| Psychology | 37 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,323,902
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Pain (03043959)
#1,211
of 6,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,393
of 102,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain (03043959)
#8
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.