↓ Skip to main content

ESPR Uroradiology Taskforce—imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part VIII: retrograde urethrography, imaging disorder of sexual development and imaging childhood testicular torsion

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
ESPR Uroradiology Taskforce—imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part VIII: retrograde urethrography, imaging disorder of sexual development and imaging childhood testicular torsion
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00247-015-3452-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Riccabona, Kassa Darge, Maria-Luisa Lobo, Lil-Sophie Ording-Muller, Thomas A. Augdal, Fred E. Avni, Johan Blickman, Beatrice M. Damasio, Aikaterini Ntoulia, Frederika Papadopoulou, Pierre-Hughes Vivier, Ulrich Willi

Abstract

Three new consensus-based recommendations of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Uroradiology Taskforce and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Paediatric Working Group on paediatric uroradiology are presented. One deals with indications and technique for retrograde urethrography, one with imaging in the work-up for disorders of sexual development and one with imaging workflow in suspected testicular torsion. The latter is subdivided to suggest a distinct algorithm to deal with testicular torsion in neonates. These proposals aim to outline effective imaging algorithms to optimise diagnostic accuracy and to harmonize diagnostic imaging among institutions and practitioners.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Other 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 10 30%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Psychology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,783,180
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#135
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,414
of 387,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.