↓ Skip to main content

DeFries–Fulker Analysis of Twin Data with Skewed Distributions: Cautions and Recommendations from a Study of Children’s Use of Verb Inflections

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
DeFries–Fulker Analysis of Twin Data with Skewed Distributions: Cautions and Recommendations from a Study of Children’s Use of Verb Inflections
Published in
Behavior Genetics, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10519-004-1834-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. V. M. Bishop

Abstract

DeFries-Fulker (DF) analysis is an adaptation of multiple regression that is used to estimate heritability of extreme scores (h(g)2) on a dimension. Probands are identified as scoring below a cutoff that defines impairment, and one then uses regression to predict the scores of co-twins from the proband scores and a term that denotes the genetic relationship between twins (1.0 for MZ and 0.5 for DZ twins). This paper reports illustrative data and simulations for the situation where the dimensional variable shows substantial negative skew. Two types of simulation were conducted: in the first, an underlying polygenic liability dimension was normally distributed: skewing was introduced by transforming or truncating the liability distribution. In the second set of simulations, skewing arose because an infrequent defective gene impaired scores. In both sets of simulations DF analysis was robust in the face of severe skewing of the data. DF analysis can provide two pointers to major gene effects on extreme scores on a trait with a skewed distribution: first, group heritability estimates will be higher for the original skewed data than for normalised data; second, estimates of h(g)2 will increase as the cutoff to identify probands is made more stringent. Both these features were seen in data from a test of verb inflections given to 174 6-year-old twin pairs, suggesting that a single major gene may be implicated in causing impaired grammatical development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 38%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,750,904
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#332
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,025
of 56,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.